911 Truth Seekers

9/11 Inside Job: All Evidence, No Theories!

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:30:00 -0200

9/11 was an Inside Job! Heres bulletproof evidence (by Randy Louis)

Comments regarding Prof. Jones Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?

Fri, 05 May 2006 21:40:00 -0200

(May 16, 2006)(Revision 2 - More comments will be added as there is time. Not all of this will be fan-mail)

Quotations from Lectures on Secret Combinations, Illuminati, Conspiracy, Constitution

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:00:00 -0200

The following are quotations gathered and information regarding Secret Societies: Rothschild, Rockefeller, Skull and Bones, Illuminati, Bilderbergers, Bohemian Grove, New World Order, United Nations, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, etc. . . . (quotes compiled by Ken Bowers)

The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:10:00 -0200

In The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 (2004), I summarized dozens of facts and reports that cast doubt on the official story about 9/11. Then in The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (2005a), I discussed the way these various facts and reports were treated by the 9/11 Commission, namely, by distorting or simply omitting them. I have also taken this big-picture approach, with its cumulative argument, in my previous essays and lectures on 9/11 (Griffin, 2005b and 2005d).[1] This approach, which shows every aspect of the official story to be problematic, provides the most effective challenge to the official story. But this way of presenting the evidence has one great limitation, especially when used in lectures and essays: It means that the treatment of every particular issue must be quite brief, hence superficial. People can thereby be led to suspect that a more thorough treatment of any particular issue might show the official story to be plausible after all. In the present essay, I focus on one question: why the Twin Towers and building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed. One advantage of this focus, besides the fact that it allows us to go into considerable detail, is that the destruction of the World Trade Center provides one of the best windows into the truth about 9/11. Another advantage of this focus is that it will allow us to look at revelations contained in the 9/11 oral histories, which were recorded by the New York Fire Department shortly after 9/11 but released to the public only in August of 2005...

Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:50:00 -0200

Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?

By Dr. Steven E. Jones

Physicist and Archaeometrist

The views in this paper are the sole responsibility of the author.

The paper has undergone significant modifications following an additional set of peer reviews organized by Journal of 9/11 Studies Editor Kevin Ryan.

An earlier version is now published in a volume edited by David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, 9/11 And The American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Northhampton, MA: Interlink Publishing, 2006. It is published here by kind permission of the editors. One of the editors (Prof. Griffin) has explained that there were four reviewers for my paper, all Ph.Ds, two were physicists. To clarify some apparent confusion: the paper is not published in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Elsevier, 2006.

Translated versions are available:

En Español:"¿Por qué se derrumbaron realmente los edificios del WTC?"