<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>911 Truth Seekers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.911truthseekers.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.911truthseekers.org</link>
	<description>Seeking truth about events of September 11th, 2001, 911, possible government cover up conspiracy inside job</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Proof that 9/11 Truthers Are Dangerous</title>
		<link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100310161739525</link>
		<comments>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100310161739525#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>911truth.org :::::</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[911 Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100310161739525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington's Blog
March 8, 2010
Most Americans don't know what kind of people 9/11 truthers really are. So they can't figure out  whether or not they are dangerous.
Below is a list of people who question what our Government has said about 9/11.
The list proves -- once and for all -- that people who question 9/11 are dangerous.

Email this list to everyone you know, to prove to them that 9/11 truthers are all dangerous nut cases.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Washington's Blog
March 8, 2010
Most Americans don't know what kind of people 9/11 truthers really are. So they can't figure out  whether or not they are dangerous.
Below is a list of people who question what our Government has said about 9/11.
The list proves -- once and for all -- that people who question 9/11 are dangerous.

Email this list to everyone you know, to prove to them that 9/11 truthers are all dangerous nut cases.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100310161739525/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citizen&#8217;s Arrest of Alleged War Criminal George W. Bush in Canada: Trial Underway</title>
		<link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100310155337373</link>
		<comments>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100310155337373#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>911truth.org :::::</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[911 Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100310155337373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SPS versus "W" in Court Hearings in Calgary
By Carol Brouillet
  March 7, 2010
DailyCensored.org from Project Censored
 Dacajaweiah, John Boncore, or Splitting the Sky, is not a man of few words.  If you read his hefty 653-page autobiography, it is very clear that he has lived an extraordinary life and has survived more than his share of violence, to find deep within himself a well of energy and spirit enabling him to not only endure hardships, but to serve his people and the land in the timeless struggle against oppression and tyranny.  From the Attica Rebellion to Gustafen Lake to Calgary in 2009, when he attempted a citizens arrest of George W. Bush, Dac has consciously taken a leadership role to politically challenge the powerful forces that dominate the North American continent.  Brutally arrested for his action, he earned his day in court to voice not only his defense, but to highlight the hypocrisy and criminality of the Canadian government for allowing Bush into Canada, and to firmly establish the legal defense of civil resistance, the duty of citizens to act when our governments and their agents are derelict in their duty. This will be very useful in the future to rein these criminals in.
Prior to Bushs visit, the group Lawyers Against the War asked Canadian officials to bar entry or try Bush for his suspected crimes since Canadian Law prohibits people suspected of any involvement in torture or other war crimes and crimes against humanity from entering Canada for any period and for any purpose. The most recent report of the War Crimes Program affirms the necessity of barring war crimes suspects from Canada: The most effective way to deny safe haven to people involved or complicit in war crimes or crimes against humanity is to prevent them from coming to Canada.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[SPS versus "W" in Court Hearings in Calgary
By Carol Brouillet
  March 7, 2010
DailyCensored.org from Project Censored
 Dacajaweiah, John Boncore, or Splitting the Sky, is not a man of few words.  If you read his hefty 653-page autobiography, it is very clear that he has lived an extraordinary life and has survived more than his share of violence, to find deep within himself a well of energy and spirit enabling him to not only endure hardships, but to serve his people and the land in the timeless struggle against oppression and tyranny.  From the Attica Rebellion to Gustafen Lake to Calgary in 2009, when he attempted a citizens arrest of George W. Bush, Dac has consciously taken a leadership role to politically challenge the powerful forces that dominate the North American continent.  Brutally arrested for his action, he earned his day in court to voice not only his defense, but to highlight the hypocrisy and criminality of the Canadian government for allowing Bush into Canada, and to firmly establish the legal defense of civil resistance, the duty of citizens to act when our governments and their agents are derelict in their duty. This will be very useful in the future to rein these criminals in.
Prior to Bushs visit, the group Lawyers Against the War asked Canadian officials to bar entry or try Bush for his suspected crimes since Canadian Law prohibits people suspected of any involvement in torture or other war crimes and crimes against humanity from entering Canada for any period and for any purpose. The most recent report of the War Crimes Program affirms the necessity of barring war crimes suspects from Canada: The most effective way to deny safe haven to people involved or complicit in war crimes or crimes against humanity is to prevent them from coming to Canada.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100310155337373/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo Editorial Attacks Japanese Parliament Member Fujita</title>
		<link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100309001537785</link>
		<comments>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100309001537785#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>911truth.org :::::</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[911 Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100309001537785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A leading Japanese politician espouses a 9/11 fantasy
March 8, 2010
WashingtonPost.com

YUKIHISA FUJITA is an influential member of the ruling Democratic Party of Japan. As chief of the DPJ's international department and head of the Research Committee on Foreign Affairs in the upper house of Japan's parliament, to which he was elected in 2007, he is a Brahmin in the foreign policy establishment of Washington's most important East Asian ally. He also seems to think that America's rendering of the events of Sept. 11, 2001, is a gigantic hoax.

Mr. Fujita's ideas about the attack on the World Trade Center, which he shared with us in a recent interview, are too bizarre, half-baked and intellectually bogus to merit serious discussion. He questions whether it was really the work of terrorists; suggests that shadowy forces with advance knowledge of the plot played the stock market to profit from it; peddles the fantastic idea that eight of the 19 hijackers are alive and well; and hints that controlled demolition rather than fire or debris may be a more likely explanation for at least the collapse of the building at 7 World Trade Center, which was adjacent to the twin towers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A leading Japanese politician espouses a 9/11 fantasy
March 8, 2010
WashingtonPost.com

YUKIHISA FUJITA is an influential member of the ruling Democratic Party of Japan. As chief of the DPJ's international department and head of the Research Committee on Foreign Affairs in the upper house of Japan's parliament, to which he was elected in 2007, he is a Brahmin in the foreign policy establishment of Washington's most important East Asian ally. He also seems to think that America's rendering of the events of Sept. 11, 2001, is a gigantic hoax.

Mr. Fujita's ideas about the attack on the World Trade Center, which he shared with us in a recent interview, are too bizarre, half-baked and intellectually bogus to merit serious discussion. He questions whether it was really the work of terrorists; suggests that shadowy forces with advance knowledge of the plot played the stock market to profit from it; peddles the fantastic idea that eight of the 19 hijackers are alive and well; and hints that controlled demolition rather than fire or debris may be a more likely explanation for at least the collapse of the building at 7 World Trade Center, which was adjacent to the twin towers.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100309001537785/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ill. judge won&#8217;t toss torture suit naming Rumsfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100307140503421</link>
		<comments>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100307140503421#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>911truth.org :::::</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[911 Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100307140503421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[March 5, 2010
By MIKE ROBINSON
AP Legal Affairs Writer
The Daily Journal


CHICAGO (AP) -- A federal judge refused Friday to dismiss a civil lawsuit accusing former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld of responsibility for the alleged torture by U.S. forces of two Americans who worked for an Iraqi contracting firm.

U.S. District Judge Wayne R. Andersen's ruling did not say the two contractors had proven any of their claims. But it did say they had alleged enough specific mistreatment to warrant hearing evidence of exactly what happened.

Andersen said his decision "represents a recognition that federal officials may not strip citizens of well settled constitutional protections against mistreatment simply because they are located in a tumultuous foreign setting."
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[March 5, 2010
By MIKE ROBINSON
AP Legal Affairs Writer
The Daily Journal


CHICAGO (AP) -- A federal judge refused Friday to dismiss a civil lawsuit accusing former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld of responsibility for the alleged torture by U.S. forces of two Americans who worked for an Iraqi contracting firm.

U.S. District Judge Wayne R. Andersen's ruling did not say the two contractors had proven any of their claims. But it did say they had alleged enough specific mistreatment to warrant hearing evidence of exactly what happened.

Andersen said his decision "represents a recognition that federal officials may not strip citizens of well settled constitutional protections against mistreatment simply because they are located in a tumultuous foreign setting."
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100307140503421/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mission of 911Truth.org vs. False Assertions in the Corporate Media</title>
		<link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305140629606</link>
		<comments>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305140629606#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>911truth.org :::::</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[911 Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305140629606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[March 5, 2010

TO END, by way of integrity and god-given creativity, the regime and illicit power structures responsible for 9/11 and to replace the system that made 9/11 necessary. We solicit collaboration with others who are committed to achieving these goals by way of peaceful transformation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[March 5, 2010

TO END, by way of integrity and god-given creativity, the regime and illicit power structures responsible for 9/11 and to replace the system that made 9/11 necessary. We solicit collaboration with others who are committed to achieving these goals by way of peaceful transformation.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305140629606/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Research on State Crimes Against Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305140121201</link>
		<comments>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305140121201#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>911truth.org :::::</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[911 Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305140121201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff
March 4, 2010
DailyCensored.com
New research in the journal American Behavioral Scientist (Sage publications, 
  February 2010) addresses the concept of &#34;State Crimes Against Democracy" 
  (SCAD). Professor Lance deHaven-Smith from Florida State University writes that 
  SCADs involve highlevel government officials, often in combination with private 
  interests, that engage in covert activities for political advantages and power. 
  Proven SCADs since World War II include McCarthyism (fabrication of evidence 
  of a communist infiltration), Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (President Johnson and 
  Robert McNamara falsely claimed North Vietnam attacked a US ship), burglary 
  of the office of Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist in effort to discredit 
  Ellsberg, the Watergate break-in, Iran-Contra, Florida's 2000 Election 
  (felon disenfranchisement program), and fixed intelligence on WMDs to justify 
  the Iraq War.1
Other suspected SCADs include the assassination of Lee Harvey Oswald, the shooting 
  of George Wallace, the October Surprise near the end of the Carter presidency, 
  military grade anthrax mailed to Senators Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy, Martin 
  Luther King's assassination, and the collapse of World Trade Center Building 
  7 on September 11, 2001. The proven SCADs have a long trail of congressional 
  hearings, public records, and academic research establishing the truth of the 
  activities. The suspected SCADs listed above have substantial evidence of covert 
  actions with countervailing deniability that tend to leave the facts in dispute.2
The term &#34;conspiracy theory" is often used to denigrate and discredit 
  inquiry into the veracity of suspected SCADs. Labeling SCAD research as &#34;conspiracy 
  theory" is an effective method of preventing ongoing investigations from being 
  reported in the corporate media and keep them outside of broader public scrutiny. 
  Psychologist Laurie Manwell, University of Guelph, addresses the psychological 
  advantage that SCAD actors hold in the public sphere. Manwell, writing in American 
  Behavioral Scientist (Sage 2010) states, &#34;research shows that people 
  are far less willing to examine information that disputes, rather than confirms, 
  their beliefs . . . pre-existing beliefs can interfere with SCADs inquiry, especially 
  in regards to September 11, 2001."3]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[By Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff
March 4, 2010
DailyCensored.com
New research in the journal American Behavioral Scientist (Sage publications, 
  February 2010) addresses the concept of &quot;State Crimes Against Democracy" 
  (SCAD). Professor Lance deHaven-Smith from Florida State University writes that 
  SCADs involve highlevel government officials, often in combination with private 
  interests, that engage in covert activities for political advantages and power. 
  Proven SCADs since World War II include McCarthyism (fabrication of evidence 
  of a communist infiltration), Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (President Johnson and 
  Robert McNamara falsely claimed North Vietnam attacked a US ship), burglary 
  of the office of Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist in effort to discredit 
  Ellsberg, the Watergate break-in, Iran-Contra, Florida's 2000 Election 
  (felon disenfranchisement program), and fixed intelligence on WMDs to justify 
  the Iraq War.1
Other suspected SCADs include the assassination of Lee Harvey Oswald, the shooting 
  of George Wallace, the October Surprise near the end of the Carter presidency, 
  military grade anthrax mailed to Senators Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy, Martin 
  Luther King's assassination, and the collapse of World Trade Center Building 
  7 on September 11, 2001. The proven SCADs have a long trail of congressional 
  hearings, public records, and academic research establishing the truth of the 
  activities. The suspected SCADs listed above have substantial evidence of covert 
  actions with countervailing deniability that tend to leave the facts in dispute.2
The term &quot;conspiracy theory" is often used to denigrate and discredit 
  inquiry into the veracity of suspected SCADs. Labeling SCAD research as &quot;conspiracy 
  theory" is an effective method of preventing ongoing investigations from being 
  reported in the corporate media and keep them outside of broader public scrutiny. 
  Psychologist Laurie Manwell, University of Guelph, addresses the psychological 
  advantage that SCAD actors hold in the public sphere. Manwell, writing in American 
  Behavioral Scientist (Sage 2010) states, &quot;research shows that people 
  are far less willing to examine information that disputes, rather than confirms, 
  their beliefs . . . pre-existing beliefs can interfere with SCADs inquiry, especially 
  in regards to September 11, 2001."3]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305140121201/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entire February 2010 Issue of the American Behavioral Scientist Devoted to State Crimes Against Democracy: The Case of 9/11/2001</title>
		<link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305133037912</link>
		<comments>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305133037912#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>911truth.org :::::</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[911 Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305133037912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[March 5, 2010
by Elizabeth Woodworth, Professional Librarian
Posted at AE911truth.org

"It's 
  now confirmed that the February edition is available in print, and can be ordered 
  for $24 for the whole issue.
Contact SAGE Journals Customer Service department via e-mail at journals@sagepub.com 
  or phone 1-800-818-7243 then hit #2, then #0 for operator, then ask for "Journals", 
  and they will mail a copy.
Otherwise individual papers cost $25 to be viewed for one day, on the journal's 
  website, and cannot be downloaded from it. (Because the pdf could be freely 
  circulated if it were downloadable)."
For 50 years the American Behavioral Scientist has been a leading source of 
  behavioral research for the academic world. Its influence is shown by the fact 
  that it is indexed by an extraordinary 67 major database services, causing its 
  papers to be widely exposed on the international scene.
The publisher, Sage, is headquartered in Los Angeles, with offices in London, 
  New Delhi, Singapore, and Washington DC.
Each issue offers comprehensive analysis of a single topic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[March 5, 2010
by Elizabeth Woodworth, Professional Librarian
Posted at AE911truth.org

"It's 
  now confirmed that the February edition is available in print, and can be ordered 
  for $24 for the whole issue.
Contact SAGE Journals Customer Service department via e-mail at journals@sagepub.com 
  or phone 1-800-818-7243 then hit #2, then #0 for operator, then ask for "Journals", 
  and they will mail a copy.
Otherwise individual papers cost $25 to be viewed for one day, on the journal's 
  website, and cannot be downloaded from it. (Because the pdf could be freely 
  circulated if it were downloadable)."
For 50 years the American Behavioral Scientist has been a leading source of 
  behavioral research for the academic world. Its influence is shown by the fact 
  that it is indexed by an extraordinary 67 major database services, causing its 
  papers to be widely exposed on the international scene.
The publisher, Sage, is headquartered in Los Angeles, with offices in London, 
  New Delhi, Singapore, and Washington DC.
Each issue offers comprehensive analysis of a single topic.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100305133037912/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behind the &#8216;War on Terror&#8217; &#8211; Cynthia McKinney, Dr Nafeez Ahmed and Ian Henshall</title>
		<link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100303123110142</link>
		<comments>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100303123110142#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>911truth.org :::::</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[911 Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100303123110142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meeting organised by Reinvestigate 911

Lecture room V211 SOAS Vernon Square Campus
7.00 for 7.30 Monday March 8
Entrance free, donations welcome.
Cynthia McKinney
Member of the US House of Representatives for 12 years and now a global campaigner for many human rights causes, including Palestine. Cynthia was targeted for removal from the US Congress after asking what the White House knew about 9/11 and when they knew it. Last year she was snatched by Israel from a ship trying to lift the blockade of Gaza and held illegally for a week.

Dr Nafeez Ahmed
UK based terrorism expert. He has questioned some of the key tenets of Bush's "War on Terror", a posture which has continued in all but name under the new administration. He is the author on The London Bombings and The War on Truth.

Ian Henshall
Is author of 911 The New Evidence and a co-ordinator or Reinvestigate 911
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Meeting organised by Reinvestigate 911

Lecture room V211 SOAS Vernon Square Campus
7.00 for 7.30 Monday March 8
Entrance free, donations welcome.
Cynthia McKinney
Member of the US House of Representatives for 12 years and now a global campaigner for many human rights causes, including Palestine. Cynthia was targeted for removal from the US Congress after asking what the White House knew about 9/11 and when they knew it. Last year she was snatched by Israel from a ship trying to lift the blockade of Gaza and held illegally for a week.

Dr Nafeez Ahmed
UK based terrorism expert. He has questioned some of the key tenets of Bush's "War on Terror", a posture which has continued in all but name under the new administration. He is the author on The London Bombings and The War on Truth.

Ian Henshall
Is author of 911 The New Evidence and a co-ordinator or Reinvestigate 911
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100303123110142/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As Ground Zero cases go to trial, respirator rule is revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100302041446733</link>
		<comments>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100302041446733#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>911truth.org :::::</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[911 Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100302041446733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[February 28, 2010
by Alison Gendar
New York Daily News 


A lawyer in two Ground Zero sickness cases green-lighted for trial says he has a smoking gun: buried city documents that prove firefighters should have gotten respirators.

The papers emerged in a veritable mountain of files the city turned over to workers who believe they were sickened by toxins after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Lawyer Andrew Carboy, whose firm represents more than 600 firefighters, said the FDNY had rules on the book requiring Bravest be equipped with respirators before Sept. 11.

But memos showing that weren't handed over until this summer - in a data dump of 3 million documents - five years after the legal battle began. "They provide everyone with helmets, with bunker gear, with [air] packs. They could have done the same with respirators, and they withheld the documents saying they had a program to do it," Carboy said.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[February 28, 2010
by Alison Gendar
New York Daily News 


A lawyer in two Ground Zero sickness cases green-lighted for trial says he has a smoking gun: buried city documents that prove firefighters should have gotten respirators.

The papers emerged in a veritable mountain of files the city turned over to workers who believe they were sickened by toxins after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Lawyer Andrew Carboy, whose firm represents more than 600 firefighters, said the FDNY had rules on the book requiring Bravest be equipped with respirators before Sept. 11.

But memos showing that weren't handed over until this summer - in a data dump of 3 million documents - five years after the legal battle began. "They provide everyone with helmets, with bunker gear, with [air] packs. They could have done the same with respirators, and they withheld the documents saying they had a program to do it," Carboy said.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100302041446733/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Road to Armageddon</title>
		<link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100226025637240</link>
		<comments>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100226025637240#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>911truth.org :::::</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[911 Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100226025637240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[February 25, 2010By Paul Craig Roberts
opednews.com 


  The Washington Times is a newspaper that looks with favor upon the 
  Bush/Cheney/Obama/neocon wars of aggression in the Middle East and favors making 
  terrorists pay for 9/11. Therefore, I was surprised to learn on February 24 
  that the most popular story on the paper's website for the past three days was 
  the &#34;Inside the Beltway&#34; report, &#34;Explosive News,&#34; about 
  the 31 press conferences in cities in the US and abroad on February 19 held 
  by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an organization of professionals 
  which now has 1,000 members.
I was even more surprised that the news report treated the press conference 
  seriously.How did three World Trade Center skyscrapers suddenly disintegrate 
  into fine dust? How did massive steel beams in three skyscrapers suddenly fail 
  as a result of short-lived, isolated, and low temperature fires? &#34;A thousand 
  architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order 
  a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7,&#34; 
  reports the Washington Times.
The paper reports that the architects and engineers have concluded that the 
  Federal Emergency Management Agency and the National Institute of Standards 
  and Technology provided &#34;insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts 
  of the circumstances of the towers' destruction&#34; and are &#34;calling 
  for a grand jury investigation of NIST officials.&#34;
The newspaper reports that Richard Gage, the spokesperson for the architects 
  and engineers said: &#34;Government officials will be notified that &#34;Misprision 
  of Treason,' U.S. Code 18 (Sec. 2382) is a serious federal offense, which requires 
  those with evidence of treason to act. The implications are enormous and may 
  have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Sheik Mohammed trial.&#34;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[February 25, 2010By Paul Craig Roberts
opednews.com 


  The Washington Times is a newspaper that looks with favor upon the 
  Bush/Cheney/Obama/neocon wars of aggression in the Middle East and favors making 
  terrorists pay for 9/11. Therefore, I was surprised to learn on February 24 
  that the most popular story on the paper's website for the past three days was 
  the &quot;Inside the Beltway&quot; report, &quot;Explosive News,&quot; about 
  the 31 press conferences in cities in the US and abroad on February 19 held 
  by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an organization of professionals 
  which now has 1,000 members.
I was even more surprised that the news report treated the press conference 
  seriously.How did three World Trade Center skyscrapers suddenly disintegrate 
  into fine dust? How did massive steel beams in three skyscrapers suddenly fail 
  as a result of short-lived, isolated, and low temperature fires? &quot;A thousand 
  architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order 
  a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7,&quot; 
  reports the Washington Times.
The paper reports that the architects and engineers have concluded that the 
  Federal Emergency Management Agency and the National Institute of Standards 
  and Technology provided &quot;insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts 
  of the circumstances of the towers' destruction&quot; and are &quot;calling 
  for a grand jury investigation of NIST officials.&quot;
The newspaper reports that Richard Gage, the spokesperson for the architects 
  and engineers said: &quot;Government officials will be notified that &quot;Misprision 
  of Treason,' U.S. Code 18 (Sec. 2382) is a serious federal offense, which requires 
  those with evidence of treason to act. The implications are enormous and may 
  have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Sheik Mohammed trial.&quot;
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20100226025637240/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
