June 2009

News from AE911truth.org:
June 17, 2009

Richard Gage, AIA, was George NooryÂ’s guest on the national Coast to Coast AM radio show on Tuesday, June 9 at 11 PM PDT. This was a great mass-audience breakthrough for AE911Truth and we want to thank Coast to Coast listeners who have visited our website and signed our petition in great numbers.

The full three-hour interview with Richard Gage, AIA, is available in 12 parts, starting at 911 truth p 1 / 12.

Also: 9/11: Blueprint for Truth — The Architecture of Destruction — 2008 Companion Edition DVD.

By Stephanie Gaskell
Daily News Staff Writer
Tuesday, June 16th 2009
New York Daily News.com

Nearly 2,000 sick 9/11 first responders could be left without medical care
while a New Jersey hospital battles with the federal government for more money,
the Daily News has learned.
The Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences Institute at the Robert
Wood Johnson Medical School in ., says it expects to run out of federal funding
next month.
It has requested more money, but the Office of Management and Budget in Washington
has disputed the hospital is broke.
"The promise is that the check’s in the mail," said Dr. James Melius,
of the New York State Laborers’ Health and Safety Fund. "But it’s been
in the mail now for two months."

By James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Founder, 911 Truth of Central Iowa
When I was living in Brazil as an academic two decades ago, the country’s
powerful military, after years of running the show, cut a deal with the ascendant
progressive civilian politicians giving them full latitude unimpeded within
a certain sphere, but leaving other aspects of the country’s affairs strictly
and permanently under military control. The result was Brazil’s new Constitution
of 1988, which made voting a compulsory duty of citizenship. As a result, no
non-progressive candidate for the presidency has gotten anywhere since. But
elective civilian power is strictly limited.
It strikes me that the relationship between the constitutional government
of the U.S. and its para-military security services, the tools of shadow dictators
of multinational mega-business, has gotten to be strikingly similar. If my observation
is correct, it would largely explain the seeming cowardice and complicit status
of the whole Congress, vis-à-vis the rogue executive branch and its repeated
trampling of the Constitution in recent years: Congress, including its progressives,
simply knows where the line is. And Congress knows, even in advance, that the
Executive, brought to heel by the shadow government’s board of directors,
will disdain the Constitution and public opinion in carrying out its ruthlessly
enforceable “agreement” with the true sovereigns of the United States.

I am as dismayed as anyone that our new, more progressive President has not
so far turned out to be a change agent in the vital sphere of civil liberties
and restoring accountability through due process. But, my take is a bit different
than most: I suspect that he doesn’t govern as an enlightened democratic
leader, responsive to the public will and constitutional mandates, because he
can’t. Like his recent “progressive” predecessors
(maybe more than them, because he was maybe not supposed to gain the presidency),
he governs with a gun to his head. Even so, he might have a scheme in mind and
make a dash to put it into effect at some point. Highly intelligent JFK, like
Lincoln earlier, tried a gambit (by way of disestablishing the Fed and introducing
the “Greenback”, respectively) to defeat the encroaching financial
masters. And, apparently, both paid.

By Rory O’Connor, MediaChannel.org
Posted June 12, 2009.
Powerful prosecutor and public figure Patrick Fitzgerald has been waging
a chilling private jihad aimed at "killing" a book critical of him.
Okay, so he’s one of the "sexiest
men alive" — but what does Patrick Fitzgerald, the U.S. Attorney in
Chicago and Special Counsel in the CIA leak case, have against us poor, unsexy
journalists? It’s bad enough that Fitzie won’t answer my questions: ("Rory.
I just wanted to get back to you and let you know that I am going to decline
to be interviewed. Thank you. Pat") It’s worse that he was responsible
for the jailing of New York Times reporter Judith Miller, who spent
85 days behind bars. Now comes word that Fitzgerald, who must have too much
time on his hands now that Scooter Libby has been freed and Rod Blagojevich
indicted, spent much of the last year and a half going after another journalist,
Peter Lance, in an attempt to kill a new edition of Lance’s investigative book
Triple Cross by threatening to sue both the author and his publisher
for libel.
Originally
published in November 2006 by Regan Books, a division of Harper_Collins,
Triple Cross uncovers the story of how Al Qaeda master spy Ali Mohamed
infiltrated U.S. intelligence in the years leading up to 9/11 – "and how
the FBI’s elite bin Laden squad failed to stop him." Among the radicals
trained by Ali Mohamed –and photographed by the FBI in 1989 — one would go
on to kill Rabbi Meier Kahane in 1990; three were convicted in the World Trade
Center bombing in 1994; and two (including Kahane’s killer) were later convicted
by then-Assistant U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald in 1995 in what became known as the
"Day of Terror" plot to blow up the bridges and tunnels into Manhattan.
The book also details how the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s offices in New York
prosecuted terrorists before 9/11, including "Blind Sheik" Omar Abdel
Rahman, who infamously tried to blow up the World Trade Center, and others who
bombed US embassies in Africa. And Lance alleges that Fitzgerald, when he was
an assistant U.S. attorney in the 1990s, discounted information that may have
revealed the existence of an Al Qaeda cell in New York years prior to September
11, 2001.

Frank Morales
June, 2009
It’s late spring 2009 in New York City and an unannounced unidentified
U.S. government plane streaks across town. Recollecting the horrors of 9/11,
the incident scares the he-be-gee-bees out of the citizenry. Some miles to the
north, U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer (D/NY), while attending an April 18th
“Tour of the Battenkill” annual bicycle race in Cambridge, New York,
responds to a question regarding efforts here in New York City to establish
a new investigation of 9/11. Lending his qualified support to such an inquiry,
he said that he was positively disposed toward a new investigation into the
events of 9/11, though his support for such a probe would depend on the form
it would take. “I think it’s not a bad idea,” he said. “You
know, you’ve got to do it in a good way, but yes, I’d be for it.”
An associate of Schumer, New York State Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, also recommended
a fresh look at the events of September 11, 2001. Commenting this past May 27th
to a young reporter who himself had suffered the loss of a loved one during
9/11, the senator responded to the question of a new investigation by suggesting
that “another review, or a fuller hearing” is warranted given the
number of unanswered questions put forward by victims families since 9/11. “I
think those questions should be answered,” she stated, going on to affirm
that, “it’s important that every family member have every question
answered.”